Weird but good

A. There is a condition called myostatin deficiency. Consider the word "deficiency" which has a negative load to it. However, as a result of this condition, you would have less body fat and higher muscle mass. You can google it and see how people affected with it are Hercules-like shaped. They call it a deficiency, only because the majority of people don't have this condition.

B. (skip this part if you're not interested in medicine) While I was studying for a test on different diseases, I found out that in some cases they use population average to say if sth is normal or problematic. I don't really remember the exact real world examples of them, as I am a crammer and forget the whole subject after the exam. But as an example assume they want to declare a safe level for hormone X. They calculate the average in the whole population which migh be 100 for example. Then they say anything between 75 to 125 is normal otherwise it's a disease. The problem is that the whole population might following a bad life habit (e.g eating too much fast-food) resulting a shift in the average. So simply considering the average isn't the best way to determine the safe range.

C. Can the word "normal" be used interchangeably with "healthy" or "good"? Is an unusual/abnormal thing a bad thing? Consider geniuses, super heros, etc.

D. For a long while left-handed people were considered to be evil, just for the pure sake of not being same as majority (which determines what the norms are). The same happened to homosexuals. Similar thing for black people in the US. The list goes on.

E. Lots of conditions that are considered as physical illness, social awkwardness, bodily abnormality, mental issue, sexual deviation, etc are not proven to be bad or even counter-productive. They're merely not common.

P.s: The last two posts said a lot in favor of homosexuals. I'm not either a homosexual or a homosexuality activist. It just happened to be this way.